<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the receipts from the provision of information technology and administrative services were not Fees for Technical Services under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The services provided did not make technical knowledge available to the Indian affiliate independently, as required by the &quot;make available&quot; clause. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made on this account, allowing the appeals of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 08:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the receipts from the provision of information technology and administrative services were not Fees for Technical Services under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The services provided did not make technical knowledge available to the Indian affiliate independently, as required by the &quot;make available&quot; clause. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made on this account, allowing the appeals of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>