<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 5 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432258</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that retention charges of cylinders should not be included in the assessable value of gas supplied beyond the stipulated period. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Grasim Industries Ltd., the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, as the issue was no longer Res-Integra based on previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 5 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432258</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that retention charges of cylinders should not be included in the assessable value of gas supplied beyond the stipulated period. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Grasim Industries Ltd., the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, as the issue was no longer Res-Integra based on previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>