<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1359 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing assessment orders for A.Y. 2011-12 to 2014-15 due to the lack of seized documents during a search, rendering Section 153C assessments unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s challenge to jurisdiction under Section 153C was upheld, emphasizing the distinction between seized and impounded documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 08:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1359 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing assessment orders for A.Y. 2011-12 to 2014-15 due to the lack of seized documents during a search, rendering Section 153C assessments unsustainable. The appellant&#039;s challenge to jurisdiction under Section 153C was upheld, emphasizing the distinction between seized and impounded documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>