<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432241</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment clarified the inapplicability of Section 50C to leasehold rights transfers and emphasized the necessity of legal provisions for altering valuation methods in capital gain calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1358 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432241</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment clarified the inapplicability of Section 50C to leasehold rights transfers and emphasized the necessity of legal provisions for altering valuation methods in capital gain calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>