<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432229</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to lack of assessee representation and failure to provide reasonable opportunities. All disputed issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision with proper opportunity granted to the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT on 22nd November 2022, with the written order issued on 28th November 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 08:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432229</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to lack of assessee representation and failure to provide reasonable opportunities. All disputed issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision with proper opportunity granted to the assessee. The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT on 22nd November 2022, with the written order issued on 28th November 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>