<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 254 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31386</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act was not leviable merely because the return was filed after the prescribed due date, where it was furnished before assessment was completed. Section 5(3) permits a belated return to be filed any time before assessment, and section 9 penalises only a failure, without reasonable cause, to furnish the return required under section 5. Read together, these provisions mean that a return filed before assessment does not amount to non-furnishing of the return so as to attract penalty. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was therefore upheld and the reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 254 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31386</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act was not leviable merely because the return was filed after the prescribed due date, where it was furnished before assessment was completed. Section 5(3) permits a belated return to be filed any time before assessment, and section 9 penalises only a failure, without reasonable cause, to furnish the return required under section 5. Read together, these provisions mean that a return filed before assessment does not amount to non-furnishing of the return so as to attract penalty. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was therefore upheld and the reference was answered against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>