<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1333 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s original refund application was filed within the stipulated time, and the subsequent letter was deemed unnecessary. As the appellant was entitled to the refund based on the Commissioner (Appeals) order, the rejection was overturned, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2022 08:43:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1333 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim as time-barred. The appellant&#039;s original refund application was filed within the stipulated time, and the subsequent letter was deemed unnecessary. As the appellant was entitled to the refund based on the Commissioner (Appeals) order, the rejection was overturned, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>