<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1330 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and confirming the appellant&#039;s correct approach in reversing proportionate credit based on the value of exempted goods under rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasizes the strict interpretation of taxation laws and the importance of considering the value of exempted goods in computing proportionate credit for dutiable goods, establishing a precedent for future cases involving similar issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1330 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) and confirming the appellant&#039;s correct approach in reversing proportionate credit based on the value of exempted goods under rule 6(3A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasizes the strict interpretation of taxation laws and the importance of considering the value of exempted goods in computing proportionate credit for dutiable goods, establishing a precedent for future cases involving similar issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>