https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305929 Civil court jurisdiction is excluded by necessary implication where a special endowments statute entrusts a competent authority with deciding whether property is an endowment and provides an adequate statutory remedy. A final order under Section 77, determining that the property was private property and not a public charity or endowment, became binding because the remedy under the Act was not pursued in the prescribed manner. The same issue could not therefore be reopened in a civil suit, and the statutory determination prevailed over the civil proceeding. en-us Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Dec 2022 11:45:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305929 Civil court jurisdiction is excluded by necessary implication where a special endowments statute entrusts a competent authority with deciding whether property is an endowment and provides an adequate statutory remedy. A final order under Section 77, determining that the property was private property and not a public charity or endowment, became binding because the remedy under the Act was not pursued in the prescribed manner. The same issue could not therefore be reopened in a civil suit, and the statutory determination prevailed over the civil proceeding. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305929