https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305927 The Tribunal revisited the appeal concerning unexplained jewellery additions. The CIT(A) reduced the amount added for unexplained jewellery. The assessee explained the source of some jewellery, with the Tribunal accepting certain portions as ancestral. However, discrepancies remained unexplained. The Tribunal directed the AO to make additions based on the revised unexplained quantities of gold and diamond jewellery, partially allowing the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Dec 2022 10:20:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305927 The Tribunal revisited the appeal concerning unexplained jewellery additions. The CIT(A) reduced the amount added for unexplained jewellery. The assessee explained the source of some jewellery, with the Tribunal accepting certain portions as ancestral. However, discrepancies remained unexplained. The Tribunal directed the AO to make additions based on the revised unexplained quantities of gold and diamond jewellery, partially allowing the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305927