<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1319 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 50,000 made on an estimate basis. It partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the estimation of income at 10% of administrative and export expenses to 5%. The revenue&#039;s challenge to the deletion of auxiliary service addition was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of disallowance of administrative and other expenses to 5%. It supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the adoption of total income before depreciation. The deletion of addition on account of deemed dividend was upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the treatment of other income. The Tribunal found no violation of Rule 46A of IT Rules. The confirmation of penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) was deleted, and the penalty was not applicable under section 271AAA. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on peripheral development and maintenance expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1319 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 50,000 made on an estimate basis. It partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by reducing the estimation of income at 10% of administrative and export expenses to 5%. The revenue&#039;s challenge to the deletion of auxiliary service addition was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the reduction of disallowance of administrative and other expenses to 5%. It supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the adoption of total income before depreciation. The deletion of addition on account of deemed dividend was upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on the treatment of other income. The Tribunal found no violation of Rule 46A of IT Rules. The confirmation of penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) was deleted, and the penalty was not applicable under section 271AAA. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on peripheral development and maintenance expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>