<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1314 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee by condoning the delay in filing, deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, vacating the protective addition under Section 56(2)(viib), and allowing the business expenses. The Tribunal also set aside the enhancement of income by the CIT(A) without issuing a valid notice, emphasizing principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1314 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee by condoning the delay in filing, deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, vacating the protective addition under Section 56(2)(viib), and allowing the business expenses. The Tribunal also set aside the enhancement of income by the CIT(A) without issuing a valid notice, emphasizing principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>