<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1300 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432183</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal emphasized the necessity to clarify the fundamental charge of manipulating the test report and the subsequent classification of the goods, as it found discrepancies in the allegations made against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1300 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432183</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal emphasized the necessity to clarify the fundamental charge of manipulating the test report and the subsequent classification of the goods, as it found discrepancies in the allegations made against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>