<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2091 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305916</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that retention/detention charges should not be included in the transaction value of gas sold in packed cylinders as they are not part of the sale price but are only levied when customers retain or detain the cylinders beyond the stipulated period. Relying on various judgments, including a decision of the Supreme Court, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, providing a clear resolution to the issue raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2091 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305916</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that retention/detention charges should not be included in the transaction value of gas sold in packed cylinders as they are not part of the sale price but are only levied when customers retain or detain the cylinders beyond the stipulated period. Relying on various judgments, including a decision of the Supreme Court, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, providing a clear resolution to the issue raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>