<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the excess depreciation claimed and rejecting the grounds related to penalty initiation. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly capitalizing expenditure related to capital assets and upheld the appellant&#039;s claims in this regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 09:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1823 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the excess depreciation claimed and rejecting the grounds related to penalty initiation. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly capitalizing expenditure related to capital assets and upheld the appellant&#039;s claims in this regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>