<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 88 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31374</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was incorrect in concluding that a notice before levying interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was mandatory. It clarified that the requirement was to issue a &quot;notice of demand,&quot; not a show-cause notice. Additionally, the court found that the assessee&#039;s appeals against charging of interest were not maintainable as they were filed only against the levy of interest under section 215, without challenging the enhancement of income. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 88 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31374</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was incorrect in concluding that a notice before levying interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was mandatory. It clarified that the requirement was to issue a &quot;notice of demand,&quot; not a show-cause notice. Additionally, the court found that the assessee&#039;s appeals against charging of interest were not maintainable as they were filed only against the levy of interest under section 215, without challenging the enhancement of income. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>