<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Reopening Assessment Unjustified Due to Lack of Evidence on Escaped Income u/s 147.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67398</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - transactions in question were in the nature of partners’ capital withdrawal - As in the communication whereby the reasons recorded were supplied, no satisfaction was recorded by the assessing officer that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Not only the said requirement was not satisfied, but as seen above, there was no actual escapment of income as well. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 18:14:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 18:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Reopening Assessment Unjustified Due to Lack of Evidence on Escaped Income u/s 147.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67398</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - transactions in question were in the nature of partners’ capital withdrawal - As in the communication whereby the reasons recorded were supplied, no satisfaction was recorded by the assessing officer that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. Not only the said requirement was not satisfied, but as seen above, there was no actual escapment of income as well. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 18:14:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>