<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant agrees to revised valuation of imported goods; tungsten content confirmed at 75.3%, leading to higher duty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67386</link>
    <description>Recovery of Differential duty - rejection of declared value - The appellant accepted the test report which determined the level of tungsten in the imported good at 75.3% and also accepted that the value of the goods would be 46.50 US$ per kg instead of 12 US$ per kg. Such being the position, the Commissioner (Appeals) committed no illegality in confirming the demand of differential duty. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:48:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant agrees to revised valuation of imported goods; tungsten content confirmed at 75.3%, leading to higher duty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67386</link>
      <description>Recovery of Differential duty - rejection of declared value - The appellant accepted the test report which determined the level of tungsten in the imported good at 75.3% and also accepted that the value of the goods would be 46.50 US$ per kg instead of 12 US$ per kg. Such being the position, the Commissioner (Appeals) committed no illegality in confirming the demand of differential duty. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 15:48:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>