<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1274 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432157</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by vacating the addition of Rs.15,58,000/- made under section 68 and the disallowance of Rs.45,861/- made under section 14A. The tribunal upheld the validity of the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer and the assessment proceedings, rejecting the other grounds raised by the assessee. The notice issued under section 148 was deemed valid, and the sanction granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax for reassessment proceedings was upheld as not being mechanical.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1274 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432157</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by vacating the addition of Rs.15,58,000/- made under section 68 and the disallowance of Rs.45,861/- made under section 14A. The tribunal upheld the validity of the jurisdiction assumed by the Assessing Officer and the assessment proceedings, rejecting the other grounds raised by the assessee. The notice issued under section 148 was deemed valid, and the sanction granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax for reassessment proceedings was upheld as not being mechanical.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>