<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1240 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432123</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeals, set aside previous orders, and remanded the matters to the ITAT for further review based on discrepancies in the Valuation Report and ownership records. The court emphasized the importance of accurate valuation considering the land&#039;s classification, use, and ownership details to determine wealth tax liability correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1240 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432123</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeals, set aside previous orders, and remanded the matters to the ITAT for further review based on discrepancies in the Valuation Report and ownership records. The court emphasized the importance of accurate valuation considering the land&#039;s classification, use, and ownership details to determine wealth tax liability correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>