https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432122 In election litigation, a reasoned order is essential because the parties and the appellate court must know the basis of the decision. Where an order allowing an Order VII Rule 11 application was pronounced but its reasons were not furnished for a long time, the order could not be meaningfully tested and was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration. The existence of a statutory appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act did not bar direct interference because that remedy would be ineffective without the underlying reasons. The merits of the dispute were left open. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:11:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432122 In election litigation, a reasoned order is essential because the parties and the appellate court must know the basis of the decision. Where an order allowing an Order VII Rule 11 application was pronounced but its reasons were not furnished for a long time, the order could not be meaningfully tested and was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration. The existence of a statutory appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act did not bar direct interference because that remedy would be ineffective without the underlying reasons. The merits of the dispute were left open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432122