<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1328 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under Section 80IB to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the manufacturing activities, though partially conducted at an external facility, were under the direct supervision and control of the assessee, using their technology and raw materials. The assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of Rs. 8,00,308/- was upheld, with the order pronounced on 04/08/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2022 09:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1328 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under Section 80IB to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the manufacturing activities, though partially conducted at an external facility, were under the direct supervision and control of the assessee, using their technology and raw materials. The assessee&#039;s claim for the deduction of Rs. 8,00,308/- was upheld, with the order pronounced on 04/08/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>