https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305883 The Court directed the Official Liquidator to remove the seals on a property, shop No.228 of Trade Centre, as evidence showed it belonged to Surendra K. Agrawal, not the company in liquidation. Despite the property being listed as the company's registered office, the absence of company records at the property supported Agrawal's ownership claim. The Court's decision aimed to facilitate the bank's recovery efforts by ensuring the property, not being an asset of the company, was accessible. The examination focused on establishing ownership without affecting other parties' claims on the property. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Dec 2022 14:55:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305883 The Court directed the Official Liquidator to remove the seals on a property, shop No.228 of Trade Centre, as evidence showed it belonged to Surendra K. Agrawal, not the company in liquidation. Despite the property being listed as the company's registered office, the absence of company records at the property supported Agrawal's ownership claim. The Court's decision aimed to facilitate the bank's recovery efforts by ensuring the property, not being an asset of the company, was accessible. The examination focused on establishing ownership without affecting other parties' claims on the property. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305883