<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 30 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31360</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the recovery/adjustment of rent from a company in India by a Netherlands-based company was not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The Court agreed that the rent recovery was connected to the cargo handling business of the Netherlands-based company and not a separate source of income in India. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax was affirmed. Furthermore, the Court accepted that even if the rent recovery was income, it could be offset against payments to the Airport Authority of India under Section 57 (iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 30 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31360</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the recovery/adjustment of rent from a company in India by a Netherlands-based company was not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The Court agreed that the rent recovery was connected to the cargo handling business of the Netherlands-based company and not a separate source of income in India. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax was affirmed. Furthermore, the Court accepted that even if the rent recovery was income, it could be offset against payments to the Airport Authority of India under Section 57 (iii) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>