https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432119 The HC found an error in the detention order under Section 129 of TN-GST Act, as the E-way bill was generated before vehicle interception. The Court set aside the impugned order, directed respondent to redo legal proceedings, and mandated the petitioner to furnish a Bank Guarantee. The order was specific to this case and did not establish a broader precedent. en-us Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432119 The HC found an error in the detention order under Section 129 of TN-GST Act, as the E-way bill was generated before vehicle interception. The Court set aside the impugned order, directed respondent to redo legal proceedings, and mandated the petitioner to furnish a Bank Guarantee. The order was specific to this case and did not establish a broader precedent. Case-Laws GST Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432119