<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1233 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432116</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST dispute involving an inter-state transaction with an expired e-Way Bill. While the petitioner challenged the State Taxes Officer&#039;s jurisdiction and imposed tax/penalty, the court did not address merits. Instead, it directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal under Section 107 of the JGST Act, providing an alternative remedy to challenge the order through the appellate authority. The writ petition was disposed of with procedural guidance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1233 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432116</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST dispute involving an inter-state transaction with an expired e-Way Bill. While the petitioner challenged the State Taxes Officer&#039;s jurisdiction and imposed tax/penalty, the court did not address merits. Instead, it directed the petitioner to pursue an appeal under Section 107 of the JGST Act, providing an alternative remedy to challenge the order through the appellate authority. The writ petition was disposed of with procedural guidance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>