https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432113 A writ petition challenging an interception statement and GST detention proceedings was not entertained where the statutory process had already advanced to notice, reply, and an adjudication order under the CGST Act. The dispute depended largely on factual questions about movement of goods, supporting documents, and the claimed need for weighment before e-way bill generation. As the petition was directed only at the interception-stage statement and the adjudication order was already passed, the Court declined to examine the facts on merits and left the petitioner to pursue the available remedy against that order in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432113 A writ petition challenging an interception statement and GST detention proceedings was not entertained where the statutory process had already advanced to notice, reply, and an adjudication order under the CGST Act. The dispute depended largely on factual questions about movement of goods, supporting documents, and the claimed need for weighment before e-way bill generation. As the petition was directed only at the interception-stage statement and the adjudication order was already passed, the Court declined to examine the facts on merits and left the petitioner to pursue the available remedy against that order in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432113