<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432099</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reversing the findings on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting methods and adherence to statutory requirements, as evidenced by legal precedents. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the need for proper appreciation of facts by the Assessing Officer to avoid erroneous disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432099</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reversing the findings on both issues. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting methods and adherence to statutory requirements, as evidenced by legal precedents. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlighted the need for proper appreciation of facts by the Assessing Officer to avoid erroneous disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>