<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 for statistical purposes. It set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings quashing the reassessment proceedings, directing a review of the additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68. The Tribunal determined that the AO had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment, supported by new material, justifying the reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:20:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=700010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1210 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 for statistical purposes. It set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s findings quashing the reassessment proceedings, directing a review of the additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68. The Tribunal determined that the AO had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment, supported by new material, justifying the reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>