https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31352 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the agreement in question was for the transfer of technology, not technical assistance falling under "Consulting Engineer" service for service tax liability. The Tribunal distinguished the case cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the consolidated payment for technology transfer. As the agreement terms differed from the previous case, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's argument and upheld the original decision. en-us Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31352 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the agreement in question was for the transfer of technology, not technical assistance falling under "Consulting Engineer" service for service tax liability. The Tribunal distinguished the case cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the consolidated payment for technology transfer. As the agreement terms differed from the previous case, the Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's argument and upheld the original decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31352