<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1198 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432081</link>
    <description>The court granted a two-month extension for the petitioners to prepare a reply to the show cause notice under Section 8(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The extended period was excluded from the 180-day computation under Section 5(3) of the Act. The court emphasized the time-bound nature of the adjudicating process and directed the petitioners to adhere to the extended timeline without seeking further extensions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1198 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432081</link>
      <description>The court granted a two-month extension for the petitioners to prepare a reply to the show cause notice under Section 8(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The extended period was excluded from the 180-day computation under Section 5(3) of the Act. The court emphasized the time-bound nature of the adjudicating process and directed the petitioners to adhere to the extended timeline without seeking further extensions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>