<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1197 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432080</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering prosecutions is subject to the same stringent safeguards as regular bail, and the Section 45 twin conditions apply at the pre-arrest stage. Where the complaint indicates involvement in creating shell companies, routing accommodation entries, and laundering proceeds of crime, the need for custodial interrogation may outweigh a request for pre-arrest protection. In this matter, the alleged proceeds of crime were still to be traced and recovered, and further interrogation was considered necessary to uncover the wider conspiracy and associated entities. Pre-arrest bail was therefore declined because the statutory conditions for grant of relief were not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1197 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432080</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering prosecutions is subject to the same stringent safeguards as regular bail, and the Section 45 twin conditions apply at the pre-arrest stage. Where the complaint indicates involvement in creating shell companies, routing accommodation entries, and laundering proceeds of crime, the need for custodial interrogation may outweigh a request for pre-arrest protection. In this matter, the alleged proceeds of crime were still to be traced and recovered, and further interrogation was considered necessary to uncover the wider conspiracy and associated entities. Pre-arrest bail was therefore declined because the statutory conditions for grant of relief were not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>