<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1190 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432073</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before them due to the classification issue involved, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the Supreme Court under section 35L(1)(b) of the Excise Act for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1190 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432073</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the appeal was not maintainable before them due to the classification issue involved, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the Supreme Court under section 35L(1)(b) of the Excise Act for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>