<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 24 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that Anywhere Banking Business (ABB) transactions were not liable to service tax before 10.9.2004 but became taxable thereafter due to an amendment in the definition of banking services. The decision was based on the understanding that ABB services enabled customers to operate their accounts from branches other than where the accounts were held, falling within the scope of service tax post the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 24 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that Anywhere Banking Business (ABB) transactions were not liable to service tax before 10.9.2004 but became taxable thereafter due to an amendment in the definition of banking services. The decision was based on the understanding that ABB services enabled customers to operate their accounts from branches other than where the accounts were held, falling within the scope of service tax post the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>