<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1317 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305867</link>
    <description>A person who voluntarily accompanies police during a preliminary enquiry is not, without more, in arrest or custody for the purposes of Articles 21 and 22 and Sections 50, 50A, 57 and 167 CrPC. The Court held that arrest-related intimation safeguards were not triggered at the initial cooperation stage, and that production before the Magistrate was valid because formal arrest had been made and the detenue was produced within 24 hours. It further held that the remand order was not illegal, as the Magistrate considered the arrest memo, medical report, forwarding report and recorded reasons before authorising police custody on judicial satisfaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1317 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305867</link>
      <description>A person who voluntarily accompanies police during a preliminary enquiry is not, without more, in arrest or custody for the purposes of Articles 21 and 22 and Sections 50, 50A, 57 and 167 CrPC. The Court held that arrest-related intimation safeguards were not triggered at the initial cooperation stage, and that production before the Magistrate was valid because formal arrest had been made and the detenue was produced within 24 hours. It further held that the remand order was not illegal, as the Magistrate considered the arrest memo, medical report, forwarding report and recorded reasons before authorising police custody on judicial satisfaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>