https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305862 The prosecution failed to prove unlawful hurt, wrongful restraint, wrongful confinement, or extortion-related coercion because the medical evidence was inconsistent, the alleged injuries could also have resulted from a fall, and the complainant's account lacked corroboration. The court also held that the summons and interrogation by D.R.I. officers were part of an investigation and did not amount to illegal confinement. Applying the reinforced presumption of innocence in an appeal against acquittal, the court found no basis to disturb the trial court's view and upheld the acquittal. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:18:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305862 The prosecution failed to prove unlawful hurt, wrongful restraint, wrongful confinement, or extortion-related coercion because the medical evidence was inconsistent, the alleged injuries could also have resulted from a fall, and the complainant's account lacked corroboration. The court also held that the summons and interrogation by D.R.I. officers were part of an investigation and did not amount to illegal confinement. Applying the reinforced presumption of innocence in an appeal against acquittal, the court found no basis to disturb the trial court's view and upheld the acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305862