https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305846 A writ petition under Article 226 alleging illegal arrest and breach of arrest safeguards could not be entertained where the material facts were disputed. The Court noted that issues such as service of notice, approval for arrest, place and time of arrest, signing of the arrest memo, disclosure of grounds of arrest, and police conduct were foundational facts requiring evidence. It held that such rival versions could not be resolved in writ proceedings on pleadings alone, and that the High Court would not undertake fact-finding in this jurisdiction. The petition was therefore held not maintainable on disputed facts and dismissed. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2022 16:42:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305846 A writ petition under Article 226 alleging illegal arrest and breach of arrest safeguards could not be entertained where the material facts were disputed. The Court noted that issues such as service of notice, approval for arrest, place and time of arrest, signing of the arrest memo, disclosure of grounds of arrest, and police conduct were foundational facts requiring evidence. It held that such rival versions could not be resolved in writ proceedings on pleadings alone, and that the High Court would not undertake fact-finding in this jurisdiction. The petition was therefore held not maintainable on disputed facts and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305846