https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305840 Where the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 transferred original civil jurisdiction in suits above the pecuniary limit to the High Court, an application to set aside an ex parte decree passed by a subordinate judge before the appointed day lay only to the High Court because it was an original proceeding in relation to the suit and the subordinate court had ceased to be competent. By contrast, execution of such decrees was not displaced: under the Code of Civil Procedure, read with the Act, the court that passed the decree and the High Court could both entertain execution proceedings, giving rise to concurrent jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 28 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2022 11:29:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305840 Where the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 transferred original civil jurisdiction in suits above the pecuniary limit to the High Court, an application to set aside an ex parte decree passed by a subordinate judge before the appointed day lay only to the High Court because it was an original proceeding in relation to the suit and the subordinate court had ceased to be competent. By contrast, execution of such decrees was not displaced: under the Code of Civil Procedure, read with the Act, the court that passed the decree and the High Court could both entertain execution proceedings, giving rise to concurrent jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305840