https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305835 After territorial reorganisation, where the court that passed the decree can no longer execute it according to its tenor because the subject-matter now falls within another court's territorial jurisdiction, Section 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure allows the decree-holder to proceed directly before the competent court. Sections 37 and 38 were read as enabling execution, not confining the decree-holder to a single procedural route, and Section 39 was held unnecessary as a prior step in such circumstances. Section 150 did not apply merely because territory was transferred. The objection to the receiving court's jurisdiction therefore failed, and the direct execution application was maintainable. en-us Mon, 09 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:58:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305835 After territorial reorganisation, where the court that passed the decree can no longer execute it according to its tenor because the subject-matter now falls within another court's territorial jurisdiction, Section 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure allows the decree-holder to proceed directly before the competent court. Sections 37 and 38 were read as enabling execution, not confining the decree-holder to a single procedural route, and Section 39 was held unnecessary as a prior step in such circumstances. Section 150 did not apply merely because territory was transferred. The objection to the receiving court's jurisdiction therefore failed, and the direct execution application was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305835