https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305834 Section 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not make the Division Bench the proper forum for a transfer application concerning a suit on the Original Side, because that provision was not extended beyond its settled meaning. Reading Section 3 with the court's structure, a Judge on the Original Side was held not to be a court subordinate to the High Court; in ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the Judge acts as the High Court itself. On that basis, the transfer application lacked jurisdiction and was dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 22 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:49:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305834 Section 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not make the Division Bench the proper forum for a transfer application concerning a suit on the Original Side, because that provision was not extended beyond its settled meaning. Reading Section 3 with the court's structure, a Judge on the Original Side was held not to be a court subordinate to the High Court; in ordinary original civil jurisdiction, the Judge acts as the High Court itself. On that basis, the transfer application lacked jurisdiction and was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Dec 1926 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305834