<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The honorable Supreme Court while considering Cr.PC and Foods and drugs related laws held that “ The law, is meant to exist as a shield to protect the innocent, rather than it being used as a sword to threaten them.” and “the law must not be used as a tool to harass the accused”.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10908</link>
    <description>The impugned substance is a dual use bulk food ingredient listed under the Food Safety and Standards regime and not in the Indian Pharmacopoeia; Schedule K and Rule 123 exempt such dual use materials from Chapter IV licensing requirements, and the appellants&#039; valid wholesale drug licence further narrows prima facie criminal liability. The prosecution produced no scientific evidence of exclusive drug use, no recovery of repackaged consignments, and offered no explanation for a multi year investigative delay, leaving the complaint unsupported on minimal evidentiary thresholds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:35:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The honorable Supreme Court while considering Cr.PC and Foods and drugs related laws held that “ The law, is meant to exist as a shield to protect the innocent, rather than it being used as a sword to threaten them.” and “the law must not be used as a tool to harass the accused”.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10908</link>
      <description>The impugned substance is a dual use bulk food ingredient listed under the Food Safety and Standards regime and not in the Indian Pharmacopoeia; Schedule K and Rule 123 exempt such dual use materials from Chapter IV licensing requirements, and the appellants&#039; valid wholesale drug licence further narrows prima facie criminal liability. The prosecution produced no scientific evidence of exclusive drug use, no recovery of repackaged consignments, and offered no explanation for a multi year investigative delay, leaving the complaint unsupported on minimal evidentiary thresholds.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:35:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>