<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1153 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432036</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition, affirming that the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order to initiate an investigation was administrative and based on a prima facie opinion, thus not warranting judicial interference at this stage. The Court vacated the interim order dated 16.10.2019 and instructed the Director General to proceed with the investigation as per legal protocols. The Court emphasized the limited scope of its interference under Article 226 of the Constitution, noting no evidence of abuse of process or mala fides in the CCI&#039;s actions. The petitioners&#039; arguments regarding procedural fairness and alleged abuse of dominant position were deemed insufficient to halt the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1153 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432036</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition, affirming that the Competition Commission of India&#039;s (CCI) order to initiate an investigation was administrative and based on a prima facie opinion, thus not warranting judicial interference at this stage. The Court vacated the interim order dated 16.10.2019 and instructed the Director General to proceed with the investigation as per legal protocols. The Court emphasized the limited scope of its interference under Article 226 of the Constitution, noting no evidence of abuse of process or mala fides in the CCI&#039;s actions. The petitioners&#039; arguments regarding procedural fairness and alleged abuse of dominant position were deemed insufficient to halt the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>