<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for charges paid to Indian Banks for services provided by Foreign Banks. The demand for service tax was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify quantification. If any service charges were paid directly to the Foreign Banker by the appellant, the service tax liability would be on the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the demand was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for charges paid to Indian Banks for services provided by Foreign Banks. The demand for service tax was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify quantification. If any service charges were paid directly to the Foreign Banker by the appellant, the service tax liability would be on the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the demand was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>