<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432024</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the appellant followed prescribed procedures and paid duty as determined by jurisdictional officers. The demands for additional duty were not legally sustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 07:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432024</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, finding that the appellant followed prescribed procedures and paid duty as determined by jurisdictional officers. The demands for additional duty were not legally sustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>