<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1312 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305832</link>
    <description>Section 44A CPC permits execution of a foreign decree of a reciprocating territory by filing a certified copy in the forum having the character of a District Court under the Code. The Supreme Court held that, where the Delhi High Court exercises ordinary original civil jurisdiction within the notified pecuniary limits, it falls within that concept for execution purposes; the High Court was therefore competent to entertain the execution petition, and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1312 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305832</link>
      <description>Section 44A CPC permits execution of a foreign decree of a reciprocating territory by filing a certified copy in the forum having the character of a District Court under the Code. The Supreme Court held that, where the Delhi High Court exercises ordinary original civil jurisdiction within the notified pecuniary limits, it falls within that concept for execution purposes; the High Court was therefore competent to entertain the execution petition, and the contrary view was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>