<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18. It held that the executive search fees are not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the India-Netherlands tax treaty. Additionally, the reimbursement of expenses was deemed not taxable as fees for technical services. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and previous favorable decisions in the appellant&#039;s case for earlier years, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant in both matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:28:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals for assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18. It held that the executive search fees are not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty under the India-Netherlands tax treaty. Additionally, the reimbursement of expenses was deemed not taxable as fees for technical services. The Tribunal emphasized consistency and previous favorable decisions in the appellant&#039;s case for earlier years, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellant in both matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>