<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 233 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order that enhanced prices of imported consignments of integrated circuits and transistors based on questionable photocopies of export declarations. The Tribunal emphasized the unreliability of such documents and the need for additional evidence to support price increases. The Tribunal ruled that computer printouts, proforma invoices, and quotations were insufficient to justify price enhancements, especially when the authenticity of the documents was in doubt. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the price adjustments imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 233 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order that enhanced prices of imported consignments of integrated circuits and transistors based on questionable photocopies of export declarations. The Tribunal emphasized the unreliability of such documents and the need for additional evidence to support price increases. The Tribunal ruled that computer printouts, proforma invoices, and quotations were insufficient to justify price enhancements, especially when the authenticity of the documents was in doubt. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants due to the lack of substantial evidence supporting the price adjustments imposed by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>