<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1133 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432016</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a GST registration cancellation dispute, finding the petitioner had a statutory remedy under Section 30 of Assam GST Act. The Court directed the petitioner to file a revocation application within 15 days, mandating the authority to promptly process the request. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative legal remedies before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1133 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432016</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a GST registration cancellation dispute, finding the petitioner had a statutory remedy under Section 30 of Assam GST Act. The Court directed the petitioner to file a revocation application within 15 days, mandating the authority to promptly process the request. The writ petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need to exhaust alternative legal remedies before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>