<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1122 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432005</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of re-assessment notices for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06, but quashed them for 2003-04 due to improper approval. The issue of unexplained investment was remanded for further examination. The appeal for 2003-04 was allowed, while for the other years, the appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The order was issued on December 23, 2022, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1122 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432005</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of re-assessment notices for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06, but quashed them for 2003-04 due to improper approval. The issue of unexplained investment was remanded for further examination. The appeal for 2003-04 was allowed, while for the other years, the appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The order was issued on December 23, 2022, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>