<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 290 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31332</link>
    <description>When the fortnightly duty payment facility stood suspended, an assessee was required to pay duty consignment-wise and could not avoid the consequence of non-compliance by relying on deemed credit or other available credit. The record showed contravention of the rule governing duty payment during forfeiture of the scheme, although the duty for the clearances had already been discharged through deemed credit and PLA. On that footing, the demand could not survive beyond the amount already paid, but the penalty imposed by the original authority was correctly restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 290 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31332</link>
      <description>When the fortnightly duty payment facility stood suspended, an assessee was required to pay duty consignment-wise and could not avoid the consequence of non-compliance by relying on deemed credit or other available credit. The record showed contravention of the rule governing duty payment during forfeiture of the scheme, although the duty for the clearances had already been discharged through deemed credit and PLA. On that footing, the demand could not survive beyond the amount already paid, but the penalty imposed by the original authority was correctly restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>